
The year 2026 will represent a momentous inflection point with respect to HR compliance in India as the government prepares to institute the Four Labour Codes and regulations around staffing and payroll have already been tightened significantly. Employers will need to transition from reactive compliance to proactive structural measures to avoid penalties, which are sharply escalating across the board.
The government is intensifying its push for social security for all workers and to ensure that everyone is paid fairly. This state of affairs translates to a far higher risk profile for political non-compliance.
• Audits on the Rise: There is a heightened trend in coordination audits between statutory authorities like EPFO and ESIC, and the Labor Department, across multiple sectors, specifically targeting businesses that use third-party contract labor extensively.
• Scrutiny of Fraudulent Agencies: Many state labor departments are more vigilant around unregistered or fraudulent manpower consultants, especially those involved in facilitating labor for third-party clients, even though our company has taken full precautions to ensure compliance. Non-compliant agencies may also lead to payroll fraud, PF/ESI non-deposit, and salary conflicts to the principal employer (your company).
• Risk of Contract Labor: The aftershocks of the Contract Labor Regulation and Abolition Act, 1970 (CLRA) are settling in with respect to strict enforcement against the principal employer for contractor compliance failures. At least one large national employer has faced significant fines resulting from compliance failures from the contractor.
• PF/ESI Penalties: Under the proposed Social Security Code, failure to deposit, or incorrect reporting of contributions, could face penalty fees between 50 to 100 percent of the amount due in addition to the possibility of 3 years’ imprisonment for repeat offenses or more serious cases of non-compliance.
• CLRA Violations (Unregistered Agencies): Using an unregistered staffing partner or failing to maintain proper CLRA records can result in a fine of up to ₹1,00,000 for the principal employer and up to 6 months of imprisonment for responsible officers, especially under the new OSH Code for certain breaches.
• Minimum Wage & Salary Misclassification: Non-adherence to the new wage definition (including the 50% Basic Pay Rule) under the Code on Wages can attract penalties of ₹20,000 to ₹1,00,000 for the first offense, with repeat offenses carrying much steeper fines and potential imprisonment.
The liability for staffing firm non-compliance often passes to the principal employer. Vetting your staffing partner is a non-negotiable HR risk function.
🔎 Checklist: How to Identify a Trustworthy, Compliant Staffing Partner
| Compliance Requirement | Document/Proof to Request | Rationale for 2026 |
|---|---|---|
| Mandatory Registration | Certificate of Incorporation/Registration and CLRA License (if applicable) for their state operations. | Rising penalties mean unregistered agencies face shutdown, instantly jeopardizing your workforce. |
| Tax & Financial Status | GST Registration Certificate and evidence of timely GST/TDS payment (e.g., recent challans). | Ensures they are a legitimate business entity and not involved in fraudulent tax practices. |
| Statutory Compliance | EPFO/ESIC Registration Certificates and last 6 months' ECR (PF Return) & ESI Challans. | Verifies mandatory deposits for the employees they staff for you, proving they meet the 12% employer PF contribution mandate. |
| Payroll Transparency | Sample Pay Slip for a contract employee and a Process Flowchart for payroll and statutory payment. | Crucial for confirming adherence to the new 50% Basic Pay Rule (Section 4). |
The biggest change in payroll is driven by the Code on Wages, 2019, which enforces a new definition of "wage."
⚖️ Section 3.1: Mandatory Statutory Components & Contribution Rates
| Component | Basis of Calculation | Employer Contribution Rate | Employee Contribution Rate |
|---|---|---|---|
| Provident Fund (PF) | Basic Pay + DA | 12% | 12% |
| Employee State Insurance (ESI) | Gross Monthly Salary (up to ₹21,000) | 3.25% | 0.75% |
| Professional Tax (PT) | Monthly Gross Income | NIL (Deducted from Employee) | State-specific (Max ₹2,500/year) |
| Labour Welfare Fund (LWF) | Annual/Semi-annual wage | State-specific | State-specific |
Decision-Taking Answer: Employers must model salary structures assuming the full implementation of the Code on Wages, which requires minimum 50% of the CTC to be Basic Pay. This mandates higher absolute contributions for PF and Gratuity.
📅 Compliance Calendar: Key Dates
• Monthly: PF/ESI/TDS/PT Payments are generally due by the 15th of the following month.
• Annual: Form 24Q (TDS) Filing, CLRA Annual Return, POSH Annual Report.
The Code on Wages, 2019 stipulates a required minimum for the 'Basic Pay' portion, which significantly changes the salary cost-to-company (CTC) calculations.
The rule states that the total of the allowances (HRA, conveyance, special allowance, etc.) in an employee's salary cannot exceed 50% of the total wages (Gross Salary).
$$\text{Allowances} \le 0.50 \times \text{Total Wages}$$
• Effect on Basic Pay: If the overall allowances exceed the 50% mark, the excess amount will become 'Basic Wage' for the purposes of the calculation of the statutory dues like PF, Gratuity and ESI. This effectively means that Basic Pay must be 50% of Gross Salary or more.
• PF, Gratuity, ESI Effect: Since these dues are calculated off Basic Pay, a higher Basic Pay means a higher contribution from the employer to these categories.
| Current Structure (Example: ₹50,000 Gross) | 2026 Compliant Structure (Mandatory) | Change in Employer Cost |
|---|---|---|
| Basic: ₹15,000 (30%) | Basic: ₹25,000 (50%) | PF Employer Share: Rises by (₹25,000 - ₹15,000) x 12% = ₹1,200/month |
| Allowances: ₹35,000 (70%) | Allowances: ₹25,000 (50%) | Gratuity Liability: Increases due to higher basic pay for long-term employees. |
| PF (Employer Share): ₹1,800 | PF (Employer Share): ₹3,000 | Total CTC: Increases due to higher statutory contributions. |
The EPFO has advocated for a mandatory Aadhaar-based Face Authentication Technology (FAT) for many member- related services, including the issuance of the Universal Account Number (UAN).
• FAT and UAN: More and more, new UANs are being generated directly by employees through the UMANG App, using their Aadhaar number and Face Authentication (the Aadhaar Face RD App): In other words, employees are generating their own UANs outside traditional employer involvement.
• UAN Eliminating: The goal is to implement a scenario in which 'One Employee, One UAN' is mandatory by linking UANs permanently to the employee's unique Aadhaar identity, effectively stopping or reducing the presence of duplicate or fraudulent UANs. Historically, duplicate or fraudulent UANs have represented approximately 5-10% of payroll disputes within contract labour.
• Quicker, Error-Free Onboarding: Staffing agencies will be able to onboard workers and start statutory compliance (PF) immediately because the employee-generated UAN process using FAT will ultimately provide verified data in real-time.
• Reduce Fraud and Litigation Exposure: The Aadhaar and Face Authentication processes for onboarding new hires create a significant reduction in exposure, thereby reducing exposure to potential fraud by requiring verified identity and ensuring the funds will be deposited into the correct verified employee account.
The introduction of the four new codes streamlines and brings together over 29 existing central and state legislation by requiring a complete overhaul of all HR documentation and processes.
• Appointment Letters: Under the OSH Code, these are required for all employees (including fixed term contract workers) regardless of size. The appointment letter must also accurately set out the new wage components introduced by the Code on Wages.
• Hours of Work and Leave Rules: The OSH Code allows a 48-hour week but allows for a 4-day week with 12-hour shifts with consent which cannot exceed the total hours in the discussed week. Overtime payments remain at 2x the hour's rate. Employers must also modify their leave policies to align with the newly introduced threshold of 180 days for annual leave eligibility (formerly 240 days).
• Social Security Fund for Gig/Platform Workers: The Social Security Code introduces this social security protection to gig and platform workers for the first time. Companies who have used gig and platform workers will be required to remit a determined percentage (most likely at least 1-2% of their gross earnings) to a social security fund for gig/platform workers. This is a brand new cost head.
Choosing an established, compliant staffing firm is a financial risk-mitigation strategy for 2026.
| Benefit | Financial Implication | Estimated Saving |
|---|---|---|
| Zero Penalties | Avoids fines/interest on late or short PF/ESI deposits, which can cost up to 25% of the delayed payment. | $10,000 - $50,000+ per major audit/penalty. |
| Proper Documentation | Ensures CLRA, PF, ESI and Wage Code documentation is audit-ready, preventing legal costs. | 200+ HR/Legal hours saved on compliance preparation. |
| Seamless Audits | The agency handles the statutory audits for the outsourced workforce, insulating the principal employer. | Up to 70% reduction in HR team's compliance workload. |
In 2026, the complexity of statutory compliance - especially payroll restructuring, PF/Gratuity liability and new labour codes - makes outsourcing to a compliance-focused staffing partner the most effective strategy to achieve 100% legal adherence and financial stability.
The Four Labour Codes integrate 29 existing central laws into four comprehensive codes: the Code on Wages, 2019, the Code on Social Security, 2020, the Industrial Relations Code, 2020, and the OSH Code, 2020 (Occupational Safety, Health and Working Conditions).
They are significant because, when implemented in 2026, all businesses will need to reconsider the pay structure, working hours, leave rules, and documentation wholly.
Penalties are far higher and more punitive. For example, for serious violations, such as repeated failure to deposit PF/ESI contributions, employers can be fined hospital of 50% to 100% of the overdue amount and can also face the possibility of imprisonment (up to three years) for the responsible officer.
Violating the new Wage Code (e.g., misclassifying wages for payment) can result in a fine of ₹20,000 to ₹1,00,000 for violations concerning the new wage code for the first offense.
Yes. For the first time, the Code on Social Security specifically includes provisions for gig and platform workers. Companies will be required to contribute a certain percentage (probably 1-2% of earnings) of earnings for gig and platform workers to a dedicated social security fund.
Fixed-term employees will also receive the same social security benefits (like Gratuity) as permanent employees, given service requirements are met (e.g., 1-year vesting to earn Gratuity).
The rule comes from the Code on Wages - it says that the overall allowance in employee's salary cannot be more than 50% of the total wages (Gross Salary).
This essentially means that Basic Pay (Basic + DA) will have to be at least 50% of the Gross Salary. Allowances will have to be lower than Basic Pay.
Higher Employer Cost: Since statutory contributions (PF, Gratuity) are calculated on the higher Basic Pay, the employer's contribution to these heads will increase.
Lower Disposable Income: For many employees, this means lower allowances and with higher statutory deductions (PF/ESI), will lead to a reduced net take-home salary, although their retirement savings will be greater.
The overall CTC remains the same, but the distribution of the internal elements will change.
The overall compliance movement will mean money has been moved from non-stat statutory allowances (e.g., HRA, conveyance) to statutory (Basic pay, PF, Gratuity), resulting in the overall statutory compliance part of the CTC being higher.
Yes, without question. Under the Contract Labour (Regulation and Abolition) Act, 1970 (CLRA), the principal employer retains ultimate liability for the welfare and compliance (PF, ESI, Minimum Wages) of contract workers.
If your staffing partner fails to make a PF/ESI deposit, the employee’s ultimate employer can be liable for the amounts owed, including interest and penalties.
I am Syari Raju, and with over 8 years of experience in HR operations, staffing coordination, recruitment, and project execution, I bring a strong understanding of the financial and compliance challenges businesses face. As the Human Resources Operations Manager at Voltech HR Services, I have worked with companies of all sizes to streamline payroll processes, ensure statutory compliance, and optimize operational costs. My diverse background—from engineering project execution to large-scale HR operations - gives me a practical, data-driven perspective. This blog is built on real-world experience, industry research, and firsthand insights into how payroll outsourcing in India works in 2025, helping businesses make confident and cost-effective decisions.
📞 Need help? Feel free to reach out to me at Chat with us on WhatsApp or Mail with us.

Write Comment